Justia Civil Procedure Opinion Summaries

Copia Communications, LLC, a Massachusetts company, brought this action in federal district court in Massachusetts against Seawind Key Investments, Limited, a Jamaican resort operator, and Seawind’s alleged alter-ego, AMResorts, LP, a Pennsylvania limited partnership, alleging breach of contract. The subject contract was proposed and executed in Jamaica, performance on the contract occurred almost exclusively in Jamaica, and the contract was governed by the laws of Jamaica. Both defendants, neither of which operated any business or had any corporate presence in Massachusetts, moved to dismiss, arguing lack of personal jurisdiction and forum non conveniens. The district court dismissed the case without prejudice, finding that it lacked personal jurisdiction over the defendants. The First Circuit affirmed, holding that the exercise of personal jurisdiction over the defendants was barred by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment. View "Copia Commc’ns, LLC v. AMResorts, LP" on Justia Law

Robert Gadbois (Relator) filed this qui tam action in the District of Rhode Island alleging PharMerica Corp. had violated the False Claims Act (FCA) and several parallel state statutes. Relator then filed a seconded amended complaint. The district court dismissed Relator’s FCA claim, concluding that Relator’s action and an earlier-filed action pending in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin were based on substantially the same facts, and therefore, the district court lacked jurisdiction by virtue of the FCA’s first-to-file bar. The court dismissed Relator’s state-law claims as well. Relator appealed. During briefing, the Supreme Court decided Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Carter, and the Wisconsin action was settled and dismissed, both of which dissolved the jurisdictional impediment to Relator’s action. Relator responded by broadening his appeal to include the possibility of supplementing his pleadings with the fact that the Wisconsin action was no longer pending. The First Circuit vacated the judgment of the district court to allow the court to consider Relator’s request for supplementation under Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(d), holding that Rule 15(d) is available to cure most kinds of defects in subject matter jurisdiction. View "Gadbois v. PharMerica Corp." on Justia Law